Question for the WaPost Fact Checker: Is the 15-page transcript as good as say 10 hours of testimony?

Hugh Hewitt got into it with Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler this morning after the “Fact Checker” criticized Huge for daring to ask to see the entire transcript of diplomat Bill Taylor’s testimony on Tuesday:
Taylor's testimony is unknown to me, and to you @ron_fournier. Leaked accounts are disputed. Neither you nor I know what he testified. This is why Star Chamber has such a bad reputation and why we don't do trials in secret. Don't abandon first principles to get @realDonaldTrump https://twitter.com/ron_fournier/status/1186943474903539712 

3,206 people are talking about this
Can we get a fact check on whether or not a 15-page opening statement is the same as say 10 hours of testimony please? New motto: Democracy thrives in darkness:

Why don’t Dems want Republicans and the public to see EVERYTHING that’s been said?
The screams from the left that Ambassador Taylor's opening statement must not, in any way or for even a second, be considered as other than dispositive of the guilt of @realDonaldTrump of an impeachable offense demanding conviction and removal telegraphs weakness of case.
309 people are talking about this
As for other news from his show this morning, Energy Sec. Rick Perry vehemently denied there was any quid pro quo with Ukraine:
And that’s one of the reasons that my office has said listen, if you want to follow the law, Democrats in Congress in this impeachment issue, follow the law and follow precedent. But I’m not going to participate until you do that. 3
21 people are talking about this

Question for the WaPost Fact Checker: Is the 15-page transcript as good as say 10 hours of testimony? Question for the WaPost Fact Checker: Is the 15-page transcript as good as say 10 hours of testimony? Reviewed by CUZZ BLUE on October 23, 2019 Rating: 5

No comments:

Powered by Blogger.