‘Stop smoking crack’: AP’s take on anti-abortion vs. pro-abortion legislation ‘isn’t even remotely accurate’

We’ve come to expect garbage takes from the Guardians of Truth at the Associated Press, but this one is such garbage that it’s worth highlighting:
Sorry, what?
NY passes law for abortions up to the day of birth=Muted efforts to protect abortion
VA. Law proposed to kill baby after birth=Muted efforts to protect abortion

See Flip's other Tweets

Muted? They turned the empire state building pink to celebrate a end of term abortion option in NY... I would say that is pretty damn overt

See Margaret Ferrell's other Tweets
It was One World Trade Center, actually. But the point still stands.
And yet, according to the AP, the New York law was “an abortion-rights measure in January that among other things codifies many court-granted rights.” A law that allows for abortions up until birth and offers no protections for infants born alive after botched abortions is just “an abortion-rights measure.”
Question for the AP:
It certainly isn’t pro-lifers.
It’s not. Like, at all.
Lighting up buildings. Cheering like they are at a football game. Going on TV and radio to defend infanticide. Calling babies parasites. Yup, totally muted. Bless your cardiac activity.
See Chris Tsotsoros's other Tweets

‘Stop smoking crack’: AP’s take on anti-abortion vs. pro-abortion legislation ‘isn’t even remotely accurate’ ‘Stop smoking crack’: AP’s take on anti-abortion vs. pro-abortion legislation ‘isn’t even remotely accurate’ Reviewed by CUZZ BLUE on May 27, 2019 Rating: 5

No comments:

Powered by Blogger.